|
|||||
|
|||||
In Nosal, the Ninth Circuit allowed a CFAA claim to proceed because the company whose data was misappropriated required its employees to agree that they would only use or disclose electronic information for the employer's legitimate business purposes. The Ninth Circuit distinguished a prior opinion in which a CFAA claim was denied because an employer had placed no restrictions on its employees' ability to access and use its electronic information. Violations of the CFAA can result in recovery of damages, injunctive relief and even criminal penalties, making it a valuable tool for combating misappropriation of competitively sensitive data. Like the CFAA, Missouri computer tampering statutes and the Missouri Uniform Trade Secret Act ("MUTSA") contain flexible remedial provisions, also making them effective tools for protecting confidential information in the event of a misappropriation by a former employee (or any third party). Each of these statutes - the CFAA, the computer tampering statutes and the MUTSA - requires that certain steps be taken to protect confidential information. An audit of your policies, practices and agreements with employees can identify ways in which you can improve the safeguards designed to protect your company's valuable trade secrets and other confidential information. Getting the right legal advice before and after misappropriation of those assets is key to taking full advantage of available laws and remedies. Members of our Non-Compete and Trade Secrets practice group are experienced in conducting trade secrets audits and advising clients on how to guard against theft and misuse. |
|||||
For further information, please contact one of the following members of our team: |
|||||
|
|||||
This alert is offered as a service to clients and friends of Armstrong Teasdale LLP and is intended as an informal summary of certain recent legislation, cases, rulings and other developments. This alert does not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion and is not an adequate substitute for the advice of counsel. ADVERTISING MATERIAL: COMMERCIAL SOLICITATIONS ARE PERMITTED BY THE MISSOURI RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT BUT ARE NEITHER SUBMITTED TO NOR APPROVED BY THE MISSOURI BAR OR THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI. |
|||||
Unsubscribe from our mailing list
Don't miss Armstrong Teasdale's news and updates — please add
armstrongteasdale@armstrongteasdale.com to your contact list or address book.