Armstrong Teasdale Leads Larger Area Firms in American Lawyer Pro Bono Ranking

July 16, 2014 Press Releases

When it comes to pro bono work performed by U.S. lawyers, Armstrong Teasdale ranks 113 among the nation’s largest 200 firms, according to The American Lawyer. The pro bono score reflects particularly well on AT, since the magazine ranks the firm No. 187 based on revenues. The pro bono ranking also puts AT ahead of several larger Missouri firms.

The American Lawyer, which published the pro bono rankings in its July 2014 issue, made the determinations based on survey responses submitted by law firms. The magazine used that information to calculate scores based on the average number of pro bono hours per lawyer in 2013 and the percentage of lawyers who performed more than 20 hours of pro bono work.

In making its findings, The American Lawyer excluded work done by paralegals and summer associates. It also excluded time spent on bar association work and non-legal activities for charities or on boards of nonprofit organizations.

According to the magazine’s calculations, the average amount of pro bono work done in 2013 by Armstrong Teasdale lawyers was 31.3 hours. It also found that 32.4 percent of the firm’s lawyers performed more than 20 hours of pro bono work. Based on these figures, the magazine determined AT’s pro bono score to be 31.8.

During 2013, Armstrong Teasdale lawyers worked on a number of significant pro bono matters. In one case, we represented 15 bipartisan state, regional and local elected officials who supported Glossip v. Missouri Department of Transportation, a widely-watched lawsuit in favor of equality for the domestic partner of a gay Missouri State Trooper, who was killed in the line of duty. The surviving partner was seeking spousal death benefits that the state currently only allows to heterosexual married couples.

In another example, Darryl Chatman represented a Bosnian war victim in his fight against the Social Security Administration, which tried to obtain repayment of disability benefits. Darryl’s client suffered extensive mental and physical problems attributable to the abuse suffered in an ethnic cleansing camp. Darryl, who began representing the client in 2011, convinced the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review to throw out an administrative judge’s initial ruling against the immigrant and order a new hearing. The case was recently resolved in the client’s favor.

Contact Us
  • Worldwide
  • Denver, CO
  • Jefferson City, MO
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • New York, NY
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • St. Louis, MO
Worldwide
Denver, CO
4643 S. Ulster St.
Suite 800
Denver, CO 80237
Google Maps
Jefferson City, MO
3405 W. Truman Boulevard
Suite 210
Jefferson City, MO 65109
Google Maps
Kansas City, MO
2345 Grand Blvd.
Suite 1500
Kansas City, MO 64108
Google Maps
Las Vegas, NV
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Google Maps
New York, NY
919 Third Ave., 37th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Google Maps
Philadelphia, PA
2005 Market Street
29th Floor, One Commerce Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Google Maps
St. Louis, MO
7700 Forsyth Blvd.
Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Google Maps