SEC Clarifies Conflict Minerals Reporting Requirements

May 2, 2014 Advisory

The Securities and Exchange Commission confirmed this week that it expects companies to timely file reports required under the conflict minerals rule and to comply with other provisions unaffected by a recent appellate decision holding a portion of the rule unconstitutional. The guidance was contained in a statement issued on April 29, 2014 by the Director of the SEC Division of Corporate Finance. The clarification followed the April 14, 2014 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. SEC, et al. that certain reporting requirements under the conflict minerals rule violated the First Amendment.

Effectively, reporting companies that file a conflict minerals report are no longer required to describe their products as “DRC conflict free,” having “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free,’” or “DRC conflict undeterminable.”  Rather, if a company has products that would have merited such a label, the company must disclose the facilities used to produce the conflict minerals, the country of origin of the minerals and the efforts to determine the mine or location of the origin. A company may still voluntarily describe its products using one of the above labels, provided that it has obtained an independent private sector audit. For companies that are not required to file a conflict minerals report, the guidance does not change any of the requirements under the SEC’s conflict minerals rule.

Notwithstanding the SEC’s statement about compliance with Rule 13p-1, such guidance remains subject to further action taken by the SEC or a court. A prior statement issued by two of the five Commissioners recommending a stay of the rule in its entirety pending final resolution of the litigation suggests that the Commission is divided in its response to the issue.

The SEC will consider the need for further guidance on the conflict minerals rule in advance of the June 2, 2014 filing date. We will continue to monitor the case and action by the SEC and provide updates to this alert as necessary.

Contact Us
  • Worldwide
  • Boston, MA
  • Denver, CO
  • Edwardsville, IL
  • Jefferson City, MO
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • London, England
  • Miami, FL
  • New York, NY
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Princeton, NJ
  • Salt Lake City, UT
  • St. Louis, MO
  • Wilmington, DE
abstract image of world map
Boston, MA
800 Boylston St.
30th Floor
Boston, MA 02199
Google Maps
Boston, Massachusetts
Denver, CO
4643 S. Ulster St.
Suite 800
Denver, CO 80237
Google Maps
Denver, Colorado
Edwardsville, IL
115 N. Second St.
Edwardsville, IL 62025
Google Maps
Edwardsville, Illinois
Jefferson City, MO
101 E. High St.
First Floor
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Google Maps
Jefferson City, Missouri
Kansas City, MO
2345 Grand Blvd.
Suite 1500
Kansas City, MO 64108
Google Maps
Kansas City, Missouri
Las Vegas, NV
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Google Maps
Las Vegas, Nevada
London, England
200 Strand
London, WC2R 1DJ
Google Maps
Miami, FL
3250 Mary Street
Suite 102
Coconut Grove, FL 33133
Google Maps
Photo of Miami, Florida
New York, NY
7 Times Square, 44th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Google Maps
New York City skyline
Philadelphia, PA
2005 Market Street
29th Floor, One Commerce Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Google Maps
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Princeton, NJ
100 Overlook Center
Second Floor
Princeton, NJ 08540
Google Maps
Princeton, New Jersey
Salt Lake City, UT
201 South Main Street
Suite 750
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Google Maps
Salt Lake City, Utah
St. Louis, MO
7700 Forsyth Blvd.
Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Google Maps
St. Louis, Missouri
Wilmington, DE
300 Delaware Avenue
Suite 210
Wilmington, DE 19801
Google Maps
Wilmington, Delaware