Update: Financial Reporting Council’s Guidance on Best Practice for AGMs

Kerman & Co website
October 29, 2020 Publications

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC), the body responsible for the UK Corporate Governance Code, published a report on 6 October 2020 (available here) of how, in light of the impact of COVID-19, AGMs were carried out during the first half of 2020 and whether the approaches taken best served the interests of shareholders (the Report).

The Report, and an accompanying best practice guide, was produced by the FRC by undertaking desk research of AGM notices and discussions with stakeholders (all of whom had an interest in AGMs).  Below is a summary of the key points of the Report and the best practice elements you may wish to consider for future AGMs.  If companies choose to follow some of the suggested best practices, they will need to take steps well in advance of the usual preparation time for their 2021 AGMs.

AGMs in 2020

The Report grouped the 2020 AGM approaches taken by companies into 3 categories:

1.  “Closed” meetings with a quorum in attendance

Shareholders were either not offered the opportunity to ask questions (prior or during the meeting) or were invited to submit questions in advance (with some or all answers posted on the company website).

2. Meetings with some shareholder engagement

Board members were available on the day of the meeting to present company information (via audiocast or webcast) and the shareholders were able to submit questions prior to meeting (with a selection answered during the meeting and the remainder on the company’s website).

3.  Meetings with more shareholder engagement

Shareholders were able to engage virtually with the board members on the day of the meeting.

Shareholders in categories one and two were asked to vote in advance via a proxy, whereas category three was characterised by shareholders being able to vote on the day via a voting app.

The Report’s sample of 202 AGMs found that 163 companies held “Closed” meetings and 30 that held open meetings.  This is unsurprising given the unprecedented nature of this year’s AGM circumstances that companies grappled with.

The FRC found that shareholder’s rights were best served by companies which provided highly effective and clear communication (before, during, and after the meeting) and allowed full participation either by attending in person or virtually.

Best practice guidance for AGMs

With restrictions on public gatherings and the movement of people now appearing increasingly likely to continue into (at least) the next AGM season, what actions does the FRC recommend that you take now in preparation?

  • Technology: Consider significantly increasing the use of technology to allow robust virtual interaction during an AGM.  This flexibility should provide shareholders with greater access and gives them an opportunity to hold the board to account.
  • Electronic communication: When shareholders purchase shares, consider requesting a contact email address from each shareholder and that they agree to respond to requests to move to electronic communications where possible.
  • Engagement: Ensure that shareholders have the ability to hear from the board prior to voting on any resolutions.  Therefore, companies should make every effort to put in place a system that allows shareholders to vote following presentations of the board.

In addition to implementing new technology and the ability for shareholder’s questions to be submitted and answered, companies should review their articles now in order to consider whether any provisions need amending prior to the next round of AGMs to allow for hybrid or fully electronic meetings.

A number of the suggestions in the Report will require further thought and consideration as they will not suit all companies.  The FRC acknowledges what is suitable for individual companies will depend on their own circumstances and shareholder basis.

Should you wish to discuss steps to take in preparation for your next AGM, or require further information about anything covered in this note, please contact Peter Kohl, Joan Yu, Arthur Horsfall or your usual contact at the firm.

This briefing is a general summary of the information contained in the Report and it should not replace legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances.

Originally published at Kermanco.com prior to the firm’s combination with Armstrong Teasdale in early 2021.

Contact Us
  • Worldwide
  • Boston, MA
  • Chicago, IL
  • Denver, CO
  • Dublin, Ireland
  • Edwardsville, IL
  • Jefferson City, MO
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • London, England
  • Miami, FL
  • New York, NY
  • Orange County, CA
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Princeton, NJ
  • Salt Lake City, UT
  • St. Louis, MO
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE
abstract image of world map
Boston, MA
800 Boylston St.
30th Floor
Boston, MA 02199
Google Maps
Boston, Massachusetts
Chicago, IL
100 North Riverside Plaza
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606-1520
Google Maps
Chicago, Illinois
Denver, CO
4643 S. Ulster St.
Suite 800
Denver, CO 80237
Google Maps
Denver, Colorado
Dublin, Ireland
Fitzwilliam Hall, Fitzwilliam Place
Dublin 2, Ireland
Google Maps
Edwardsville, IL
115 N. Second St.
Edwardsville, IL 62025
Google Maps
Edwardsville, Illinois
Jefferson City, MO
101 E. High St.
First Floor
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Google Maps
Jefferson City, Missouri
Kansas City, MO
2345 Grand Blvd.
Suite 1500
Kansas City, MO 64108
Google Maps
Kansas City, Missouri
Las Vegas, NV
7160 Rafael Rivera Way
Suite 320
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Google Maps
Las Vegas, Nevada
London, England
Royal College of Surgeons of England
38-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields
London, WC2A 3PE
Google Maps
Miami, FL
355 Alhambra Circle
Suite 1200
Coral Gables, FL 33134
Google Maps
Photo of Miami, Florida
New York, NY
7 Times Square, 44th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Google Maps
New York City skyline
Orange County, CA
19800 MacArthur Boulevard
Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
Google Maps
Philadelphia, PA
2005 Market Street
29th Floor, One Commerce Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Google Maps
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Princeton, NJ
100 Overlook Center
Second Floor
Princeton, NJ 08540
Google Maps
Princeton, New Jersey
Salt Lake City, UT
222 South Main St.
Suite 1830
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Google Maps
Salt Lake City, Utah
St. Louis, MO
7700 Forsyth Blvd.
Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Google Maps
St. Louis, Missouri
Washington, D.C.
1717 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20006
Google Maps
Photo of Washington, D.C. with the Capitol in the foreground and Washington Monument in the background.
Wilmington, DE
1007 North Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Google Maps
Wilmington, Delaware