U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Failure to File a Charge of Discrimination with the EEOC Is Not a Jurisdictional Bar to Suit

June 25, 2019 Advisory

The United States Supreme Court recently held that a plaintiff that fails to file a Title VII charge of discrimination with either the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or an equivalent state agency before filing a lawsuit can still proceed in federal court, if the employer has failed to timely bring the plaintiff’s noncompliance with the procedural filing requirements to the court’s attention.

In Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis, the Supreme Court unanimously held that failure to exhaust administrative remedies is not a jurisdictional defense but is an affirmative defense that must be timely asserted. Jurisdictional defenses function as requirements on a plaintiff in order to maintain a suit and can be raised at any time, whereas an affirmative defense must be raised by a defendant in a timely manner or else it will be waived. The majority of federal circuit courts had already held that the timely filing of a charge of discrimination is not a jurisdictional requirement, but rather a mandatory procedural requirement that can be waived, if an employer is not diligent in bringing the procedural defect to the trial court’s attention.

Title VII, along with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination and Employment Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, requires a plaintiff to initially file a charge of discrimination with either the EEOC or equivalent state agency, then wait 180 days for the agency to investigate or take action before requesting a right to sue letter from the applicable agency. In jurisdictions that do not have a state anti-discrimination agency, only an EEOC field office, the employee will have 180 days to file a charge of discrimination. In jurisdictions that have both, they will have 300 days to file.

Failure to exhaust administrative remedies is typically asserted as an affirmative defense to a plaintiff’s discrimination lawsuit. The Court’s decision in Fort Bend County does not change the requirements for exhausting administrative remedies, but clarifies that an employer’s failure to timely assert and prosecute this affirmative defense can result in waiver of this procedural requirement.. 

Employers and their legal counsel should carefully scrutinize a plaintiff’s lawsuit to ensure that the plaintiff has exhausted their administrative remedies.  Specifically, the employer should determine if the plaintiff filed a charge of discrimination with either the EEOC or state equivalent agency; whether the allegations asserted in the complaint are addressed in the charge of discrimination; and whether the allegations contained in the charge occurred within either 180 days or 300 days of the filing of the charge. If the plaintiff has failed to exhaust their administrative remedies, the employer should move to dismiss the plaintiff’s discrimination claims at the commencement of the litigation. This case highlights the importance of consulting with labor and employment counsel early in legal proceedings to ensure that all applicable defenses are raised at the appropriate time.

Armstrong Teasdale’s Employment and Labor practice closely monitors developments in the law and court decisions from around the country for rulings that affect employer’s legal strategies. We will issue additional alerts as the legal obligations of employers continue to evolve.

Contact Us
  • Worldwide
  • Boston, MA
  • Denver, CO
  • Dublin, Ireland
  • Edwardsville, IL
  • Jefferson City, MO
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • London, England
  • Miami, FL
  • New York, NY
  • Orange County, CA
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Princeton, NJ
  • Salt Lake City, UT
  • St. Louis, MO
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE
abstract image of world map
Boston, MA
800 Boylston St.
30th Floor
Boston, MA 02199
Google Maps
Boston, Massachusetts
Denver, CO
4643 S. Ulster St.
Suite 800
Denver, CO 80237
Google Maps
Denver, Colorado
Dublin, Ireland
Fitzwilliam Hall, Fitzwilliam Place
Dublin 2, Ireland
Google Maps
Edwardsville, IL
115 N. Second St.
Edwardsville, IL 62025
Google Maps
Edwardsville, Illinois
Jefferson City, MO
101 E. High St.
First Floor
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Google Maps
Jefferson City, Missouri
Kansas City, MO
2345 Grand Blvd.
Suite 1500
Kansas City, MO 64108
Google Maps
Kansas City, Missouri
Las Vegas, NV
7160 Rafael Rivera Way
Suite 320
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Google Maps
Las Vegas, Nevada
London, England
Royal College of Surgeons of England
38-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields
London, WC2A 3PE
Google Maps
Miami, FL
355 Alhambra Circle
Suite 1250
Coral Gables, FL 33134
Google Maps
Photo of Miami, Florida
New York, NY
7 Times Square, 44th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Google Maps
New York City skyline
Orange County, CA
19800 MacArthur Boulevard
Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
Google Maps
Philadelphia, PA
2005 Market Street
29th Floor, One Commerce Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Google Maps
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Princeton, NJ
100 Overlook Center
Second Floor
Princeton, NJ 08540
Google Maps
Princeton, New Jersey
Salt Lake City, UT
222 South Main St.
Suite 1830
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Google Maps
Salt Lake City, Utah
St. Louis, MO
7700 Forsyth Blvd.
Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Google Maps
St. Louis, Missouri
Washington, D.C.
1050 Connecticut Avenue NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 20036
Google Maps
Photo of Washington, D.C. with the Capitol in the foreground and Washington Monument in the background.
Wilmington, DE
1007 North Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Google Maps
Wilmington, Delaware