U.S. Department of Education Ends Title IX Cross-Examination Requirement

September 3, 2021 Advisory

On Aug. 24, 2021, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights issued guidance announcing that it will not enforce a key portion of the regulations concerning Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 that went into effect on Aug.14, 2020.

This guidance follows a recently issued decision by a federal district court in Massachusetts in Victim Rights Law Center et al. v. Cardona, No. 1:20-cv-11104, 2021 WL 3185743 (D. Mass. July 28, 2021) which found it to be arbitrary and capricious, and in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, to limit the testimony of witnesses in a Title IX hearing on the basis that they have not subjected themselves to cross-examination in a live hearing. Section 106.45(b)(6)(i) of the amended Title IX regulations issued last year, and recently vacated and remanded by the court, required post-secondary institutions that receive federal student aid to incorporate cross-examinations of testifying parties and witnesses in a live hearing as part of the adjudication of Title IX sexual harassment claims that fall within the institution’s jurisdiction. The district court entered an order vacating nationwide the portion of the rule that the court found to be unlawful. Prior to the court’s action, decision-makers were prohibited under the regulations from considering any information or statements provided by individuals who did not subject themselves to cross-examination during the live hearing.

In response to the vacated provision, the Department of Education has announced that it will not enforce the contested provision of Section 106.45(b)(6)(i), thereby clearing the way for decision-makers to consider information provided by absent or non-cross-examined parties or witnesses. This new U.S. Department of Education Guidance is effective immediately and only applies to postsecondary schools.

What impact will this have on live hearings?

The Department of Education is clear that all other provisions of Section 106.45(b)(i) remain in effect. This means that the Title IX grievance process must provide for a live hearing, the decision-maker(s) must permit each party’s advisor to ask other parties and witnesses all relevant questions, and the rules about relevancy still apply. The only provision of this section that the Department of Education will no longer enforce is the statement that reads, “If a party or witness does not submit to cross-examination at the live hearing, the decision-maker(s) must not rely on any statement of that party or witness in reaching a determination regarding responsibility.”

Going forward, decision-maker(s) may now consider relevant information provided by absent or non-cross-examined parties or witnesses, such as:

  • statements made during the investigation;
  • emails or text exchanges between the parties leading up to the alleged act;
  • statements about the alleged act that satisfy the relevance rules; and
  • police reports, Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner documents, medical reports and other documents.

Institutions of higher education are encouraged to review their Title IX policies and procedures to ensure they are aligned with the new guidance.

Further guidance regarding the Title IX regulations can also be expected in the near future. The Office of Civil Rights announced in April 2021 that it is undertaking a comprehensive review of the U.S. Department of Education’s existing Title IX regulations, orders, guidance, policies and other similar agency actions to fulfill the policy set out in President Biden’s Executive Order, dated March 8, 2021, on Guaranteeing an Educational Environment Free From Discrimination on the Basis of Sex, Including Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity. Following this announcement, the Department issued a notice of interpretation to confirm Title IX protects students from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. A notice of proposed rulemaking to amend the Department’s Title IX regulations is expected.

Armstrong Teasdale’s Higher Education industry team is actively monitoring and providing updates regarding new guidance from the U.S. Department of Education and Office of Civil Rights on Title IX. If you have any questions, please contact your regular Armstrong Teasdale lawyer or one of the authors listed below.

Michelle Lewis also contributed to this advisory.

Contact Us
  • Worldwide
  • Boston, MA
  • Denver, CO
  • Edwardsville, IL
  • Jefferson City, MO
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • London, England
  • New York, NY
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Princeton, NJ
  • Salt Lake City, UT
  • St. Louis, MO
  • Wilmington, DE
Worldwide
abstract image of world map
Boston, MA
800 Boylston St.
30th Floor
Boston, MA 02199
Google Maps
Boston, Massachusetts
Denver, CO
4643 S. Ulster St.
Suite 800
Denver, CO 80237
Google Maps
Denver, Colorado
Edwardsville, IL
115 N. Second St.
Edwardsville, IL 62025
Google Maps
Edwardsville, Illinois
Jefferson City, MO
3405 W. Truman Boulevard
Suite 210
Jefferson City, MO 65109
Google Maps
Jefferson City, Missouri
Kansas City, MO
2345 Grand Blvd.
Suite 1500
Kansas City, MO 64108
Google Maps
Kansas City, Missouri
Las Vegas, NV
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Google Maps
Las Vegas, Nevada
London, England
200 Strand
London, WC2R 1DJ
Google Maps
New York, NY
919 Third Ave., 37th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Google Maps
New York City
Philadelphia, PA
2005 Market Street
29th Floor, One Commerce Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Google Maps
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Princeton, NJ
100 Overlook Center
Second Floor
Princeton, NJ 08540
Google Maps
Princeton, New Jersey
Salt Lake City, UT
201 South Main Street
Suite 750
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Google Maps
Salt Lake City, Utah
St. Louis, MO
7700 Forsyth Blvd.
Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Google Maps
St. Louis, Missouri
Wilmington, DE
300 Delaware Avenue
Suite 210
Wilmington, DE 19801
Google Maps
Wilmington, Delaware