Misleading Communications Regarding Trademarks and Business Names on the Rise

March 21, 2024 Advisory

Traditionally, it has been fairly common for trademark applicants and registrants with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to receive solicitations from third parties regarding their pending or registered marks. These private companies use trademark application and registration information from the USPTO’s database, as well as public information, to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations. Many of these solicitations come from companies trying to mimic the USPTO and have the third parties pay an enhanced fee for a variety of services including (1) trademark monitoring services; (2) renewal of registered trademarks; (3) recordation of trademarks with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (4) registration of the trademark in the company’s private database; and (5) a variety of other legal services.

More recently, there has been an increase in the number of solicitations from companies that require an “urgent response.” The solicitations allege that without response, the trademark holder or business owner risks losing their trademark rights because their brand name is not registered with the USPTO and has now been filed by a third party. The solicitations are often misleading to business owners because of the need to respond quickly. These communications are not legitimate, and we do not recommend responding. Of course, if there is ever a question as to the legitimacy of a solicitation, legal counsel can assist in reviewing.

If the mark cited in the solicitation is not registered with the USPTO and you have an interest in filing an application to register the mark, we recommend first evaluating your trademark portfolio and searching the USPTO records for similar marks. Securing federal registration of a mark with the USPTO is not required but provides certain advantages, including providing public notice to third parties of your rights in the mark, the right to use the federal trademark registration symbol (i.e., ®), a legal presumption that you own the trademark, and the right to bring a lawsuit concerning the trademark in federal court. A federal registration with the USPTO is not required to have trademark rights in the U.S. because trademark rights in the U.S. are based on use of the mark in connection with goods and/or services.

Armstrong Teasdale’s Trademark Services team will continue to monitor for updates or additional red flags related to solicitation and will keep clients apprised via further email communication. If you are interested in filing an application with the USPTO, please contact your regular AT lawyer or one of the listed authors, and we are happy to assist with the process. 

Highlights

News Item

Six Armstrong Teasdale Attorneys Recognized in 2026 IP Stars

Managing IP has recognized six Armstrong Teasdale attorneys among its 2026 IP Stars. The rankings serve as a resource for companies and individuals looking for experienced legal practitioners for contentious and non-contentious IP advice...

Thought Leadership

USPTO Launches “Pre-Docketing Notice” Pilot Program for Utility Patent Applications

Advisory
Thought Leadership

USPTO Issues Two Notices Significantly Affecting IPR Process

Advisory
Thought Leadership

Standards of Review Take Center Stage in Trademark Case Accepted by SCOTUS

Kyle Gottuso and Blake Chrismer
News Item

IAM Recognizes Armstrong Teasdale, 6 Attorneys in 2026 Patent 1000

Armstrong Teasdale’s Patent practice and six of its attorneys have been recognized among IAM’s 2026 Patent 1000, a ranking of the world’s leading patent professionals. Partners Patrick Brennan , Richard Brophy , Daniel Fitzgerald...

Thought Leadership

Colorado A-Companies: Options for Artists and Investors Nationwide

Advisory
News Item

Donna Schmitt Selected for World Trademark Review 2026 Global Leaders

Donna Schmitt
News Item

IP Counsel Scott Williams Joins Armstrong Teasdale in St. Louis

Scott Williams
Thought Leadership

Trademark Fireworks in Australia: Katy Perry v. Katie Perry

A 15-year trademark dispute between pop star Katy Perry and Australian fashion designer Katie Taylor (born Katie Perry) has reached a firework moment in the Australian High Court. The dispute traces back to September...

News Item

Four Armstrong Teasdale Attorneys Recognized by Legal 500 US Elite for IP in Missouri

Patrick Coyle, Donna Schmitt, Derick Allen, and Christopher Goff
Contact Us
  • Worldwide
  • Chicago, IL
  • Denver, CO
  • Edwardsville, IL
  • Jefferson City, MO
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Miami, FL
  • New York, NY
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • St. Louis, MO
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE
Worldwide
abstract image of world map
Chicago, IL
100 North Riverside Plaza
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606-1520
Google Maps
Chicago, Illinois
Denver, CO
4600 South Syracuse Street
Suite 1400
Denver, CO 80237
Google Maps
Denver, Colorado
Edwardsville, IL
115 N. Second St.
Edwardsville, IL 62025
Google Maps
Edwardsville, Illinois
Jefferson City, MO
101 E. High St.
First Floor
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Google Maps
Jefferson City, Missouri
Kansas City, MO
2345 Grand Blvd.
Suite 1500
Kansas City, MO 64108
Google Maps
Kansas City, Missouri
Miami, FL
355 Alhambra Circle
Suite 1200
Coral Gables, FL 33134
Google Maps
Photo of Miami, Florida
New York, NY
400 Park Ave.
12th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Google Maps
New York City skyline
Philadelphia, PA
100 North 18th Street, Suite 710
Two Logan Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Google Maps
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
St. Louis, MO
7700 Forsyth Blvd.
Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Google Maps
St. Louis, Missouri
Washington, D.C.
1717 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20006
Google Maps
Photo of Washington, D.C. with the Capitol in the foreground and Washington Monument in the background.
Wilmington, DE
1007 North Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Google Maps
Wilmington, Delaware