Missouri Legislature Considers Partial Ban on Noncompetes

April 29, 2021 Advisory

Missouri’s House of Representatives is currently considering a bill that, if enacted in its current form, would curtail Missouri employers’ ability to enter covenants not to compete with employees in Missouri. Packaged with incentives in HCS HB 1202 (a.k.a. the Right-to-Start Act) that are designed to encourage the founding of startup businesses in Missouri, the proposed language regarding noncompetition agreements currently provides the following:
 

Notwithstanding any provision of section 431.202 or any other provision of law to the contrary, beginning the effective date of this section, a covenant not to compete created after the effective date of this section shall be void and unenforceable if an employee or prospective employee receives seventy-five thousand dollars or less in income from such employer or prospective employer.


For many decades, Missouri courts have enforced reasonable covenants not to compete. Under Missouri law, the purpose of enforcing a noncompete agreement “is to protect an employer from unfair competition by a former employee without imposing an unreasonable restraint on the latter.” Indeed, a noncompete in Missouri is only enforceable to the extent that it is reasonable and no more restrictive than is necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the employer. For additional insight, read “Non-Compete Agreements and Unfair Competition — An Updated Overview,” a long-standing, authoritative article that has been cited by both the Missouri Supreme Court and the Missouri Court of Appeals.

Notably, it is unclear as to whether the drafters of HCS HB 1202 also intend to void customer and employee nonsolicitation clauses for those who are paid less than $75,000. Missouri employers routinely use such clauses to prevent departing employees from soliciting away customers and co-workers. The Missouri Supreme Court has previously declared that “[t]he term ‘non-compete agreement’ refers to all restrictive covenants entered into between the employer and employees that restrict post-employment activities of the employees, including non-competition and non-solicitation clauses.” Whelan Sec. Co. v. Kennebrew, 379 S.W.3d 835, 841 n.2 (Mo. 2012). The proposed bill defines “covenant not to compete” to include agreements “in which an employee or prospective employee agrees not to compete against an employer or prospective employer or agrees not to accept any positions with a competitor of an employer or prospective employer following the termination of a business or employment relationship between the employee or prospective employee and the employer or prospective employer.”

Moreover, as noted, the proposed new law would only void covenants not to compete if the employee “receives $75,000 or less in income” from the employer. It is unclear if the drafters intend that to apply to all employees making $75,000 or less per year, or $75,000 in the aggregate during their employment.

It bears noting that the original version of the bill provided that all employer-employee noncompetes in Missouri would be void, without regard to the compensation received by the employee and without regard to when the noncompete was entered into. That has now changed so that, if passed into law, the new statute would apply only to newly entered agreements and only with respect to a certain compensation level.

HCS HB 1202 has gathered steam over the past two months, receiving “do pass” votes out of the House Economic Development Committee and out of the House Rules Committee (with the latter committee vote being unanimous) in March 2021, and was ultimately perfected with amendments on April 28, 2021. While there are currently only two weeks left in the legislative session, the substance of HCS HB 1202 can be added to other legislation that is further along in the process; specifically, a bill in the House or Senate that has already passed its chamber of origin.

Armstrong Teasdale and AT Government Strategies will continue to monitor closely developments relating to HCS HB 1202. For more information, contact any of the authors of this advisory or your regular AT or ATGS contact.   

Highlights

New Guidance for Massachusetts Employers Using Noncompete Agreements

A recent Massachusetts federal court decision provides much-needed guidance to employers, and some reassurance to all parties, regarding what consideration may support an enforceable noncompetition agreement governed by Massachusetts law. In its November 2022...

New York State Updates its Model Harassment Prevention Toolkit

By law enacted in 2018, New York State employers are required to provide all employees with annual sexual harassment training and to adopt a sexual harassment prevention policy that meets or exceeds specified minimum...

California Pay Transparency and Pay Data Reporting Law: Compliance Deadlines Fast Approaching

Following a wave of pay transparency laws across the nation, California recently enacted Senate Bill (SB) 1162, which imposes several obligations on California employers, including disclosure of pay ranges and certain pay data reporting...

Event

2023 Employment and Labor Midyear Review

Graphic for 2023 Employment and Labor Webinar

Deadline Approaching for Federal Contractors to Implement Disability Self-ID Form

Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, requires federal government contractors to invite applicants and employees to self-identify as “an individual with a disability,” as defined. The Office of Federal Contract...

NYC Publishes Final Rule on Use of Automated Employment Decision Tools

Earlier this month, the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection published its Final Rule implementing provisions of the New York City Administrative Code (the Code) relating to the use of Automated...

AI in the Workplace: Is Your Enterprise Intelligent About Artificial Intelligence?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is everywhere—from chatbots that answer questions, draft essays and write code, to virtual assistants and self-driving cars. In the workplace, it is estimated that 99% of Fortune 500 companies use AI...

Proposed FTC Rule Would Ban Employers from Using Noncompete Agreements

As has been widely reported in recent days, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued a proposed rule that, in the words of the FTC, would ban employers from using noncompete agreements with...

U.K. Government Announces Proposed Employment Law Changes

The U.K. government has announced a number of measures intended to reform employment laws post-Brexit. These are potentially important changes that would impact the law relating to non-competition clauses, holiday time and Transfer of...

Continued Economic Headwinds Force Mass Layoffs, Bring State and Federal WARN Laws into Focus

Distressed Bank Response Team
Contact Us
  • Worldwide
  • Boston, MA
  • Chicago, IL
  • Denver, CO
  • Dublin, Ireland
  • Edwardsville, IL
  • Jefferson City, MO
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • London, England
  • Miami, FL
  • New York, NY
  • Orange County, CA
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Princeton, NJ
  • Salt Lake City, UT
  • St. Louis, MO
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE
Worldwide
abstract image of world map
Boston, MA
800 Boylston St.
30th Floor
Boston, MA 02199
Google Maps
Boston, Massachusetts
Chicago, IL
100 North Riverside Plaza
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606-1520
Google Maps
Chicago, Illinois
Denver, CO
4643 S. Ulster St.
Suite 800
Denver, CO 80237
Google Maps
Denver, Colorado
Dublin, Ireland
Fitzwilliam Hall, Fitzwilliam Place
Dublin 2, Ireland
Google Maps
Edwardsville, IL
115 N. Second St.
Edwardsville, IL 62025
Google Maps
Edwardsville, Illinois
Jefferson City, MO
101 E. High St.
First Floor
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Google Maps
Jefferson City, Missouri
Kansas City, MO
2345 Grand Blvd.
Suite 1500
Kansas City, MO 64108
Google Maps
Kansas City, Missouri
Las Vegas, NV
7160 Rafael Rivera Way
Suite 320
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Google Maps
Las Vegas, Nevada
London, England
Royal College of Surgeons of England
38-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields
London, WC2A 3PE
Google Maps
Miami, FL
355 Alhambra Circle
Suite 1250
Coral Gables, FL 33134
Google Maps
Photo of Miami, Florida
New York, NY
7 Times Square, 44th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Google Maps
New York City skyline
Orange County, CA
19800 MacArthur Boulevard
Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
Google Maps
Philadelphia, PA
2005 Market Street
29th Floor, One Commerce Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Google Maps
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Princeton, NJ
100 Overlook Center
Second Floor
Princeton, NJ 08540
Google Maps
Princeton, New Jersey
Salt Lake City, UT
222 South Main St.
Suite 1830
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Google Maps
Salt Lake City, Utah
St. Louis, MO
7700 Forsyth Blvd.
Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Google Maps
St. Louis, Missouri
Washington, D.C.
1050 Connecticut Avenue NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 20036
Google Maps
Photo of Washington, D.C. with the Capitol in the foreground and Washington Monument in the background.
Wilmington, DE
1007 North Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Google Maps
Wilmington, Delaware