Patent Term Adjustment Calculations Changing – Will the Supernus Pharmaceuticals v. Iancu Decision Stand?

February 5, 2019 Advisory

In Supernus Pharmaceuticals v. Iancu (Fed. Cir. 2019), the Federal Circuit reversed the Eastern District of Virginia’s entry of summary judgment that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had not erred in calculating the patent term adjustment (PTA) for U.S. Patent. No. 8,747,897 (the ‘897 patent). In particular, the Federal Circuit found the Patent Office’s PTA reduction in the ‘897 patent to be inconsistent with 35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(2)(C)(i).

If the decision stands, it may significantly alter the manner by which the USPTO calculates PTA for some allowed applications. PTA is granted to an applicant to extend the term of a patent in order to account for delays in processing the application at the USPTO. The USPTO can also reduce the number of days of PTA based on delays caused by the applicant during prosecution (i.e., “applicant delay”). In particular, PTA is subtracted for each day the applicant fails to engage in reasonable efforts to conclude the prosecution of the application.

In Supernus, the specific rule at issue is 37 C.F.R. §1.704(c)(8), which states that any supplemental reply or other paper (e.g,. an Information Disclosure Statement – IDS) submitted by an applicant after a response, unless specifically requested by the examiner, accrues applicant delay. If such a reply or other paper is filed, the PTA is reduced by the number of days between the filing date of the reply/other paper and the filing date of the previous response.

During prosecution of the ‘897 patent, the applicant filed a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) on Feb. 22, 2011. Prior to the issuance of the next Office action, the applicant filed an IDS 646 days after the filing of the RCE. Because the IDS was filed after the applicant submitted the response (and before the USPTO responded), the USPTO characterized the submission of the IDS as a supplemental paper under 37 C.F.R. § 1.704(c)(8), and therefore calculated 646 days of applicant delay in the overall PTA determination.

The applicant challenged the reduction, arguing that they did not fail to engage in reasonable efforts to conclude prosecution. While the ‘897 patent was undergoing prosecution, the applicant filed a corresponding application in Europe. The European case granted, and on Aug. 21, 2012, a Notice of Opposition was filed against the European patent. The IDS that the applicant filed on Nov. 29, 2012, cited the information from the European Opposition. The applicant argued that the period of reduction should not include the time period from the day of the RCE filing through the day the Notice of Opposition was filed (546 days).  The applicant’s position was that they were unaware of any documents to cite in an IDS during this time period, and thus should not be penalized under the statute as failing to engage in reasonable efforts to conclude prosecution.

The Federal Circuit reversed the USPTO and District Court and awarded the applicant an additional 546 days of PTA. The Court stated that “PTA cannot be reduced by a period of time during which there is no identifiable effort in which the applicant could have engaged to conclude prosecution...” Supernus, slip op. at 15. Thus, because the applicant did not know of the European Opposition between the time the RCE was filed on Feb. 22, 2011, and the time the Opposition was filed, there was nothing the applicant could have done to conclude prosecution of the ‘897 patent. The decision highlights that if there is nothing an applicant can do to advance prosecution of an application, the USPTO cannot consider such a submission as applicant delay and reduce the amount of PTA granted.

While this holding involved the filing of an IDS, it has potentially greater ramifications. Applicant delay may be assessed for any number of reasons — some of which may be the fault of the applicant (e.g., filing a response to an Office Action after the three-month date). This decision produces a fact-specific analysis and assessment to determine whether or not an applicant may be entitled to additional PTA. If an applicant believes the assessment of the delay is improper, there are seven months from the date of issuance of the patent in which to petition the USPTO to re-evaluate the assessment (two months, plus a five-month extension).

The USPTO still has time to appeal the decision, so it is possible that it will be reversed or modified. If this decision stands, we expect the USPTO to promulgate new rules/notices to resolve these issues. Patent applicants should work closely with legal counsel to determine how these developments might impact their patent filing strategy.

Contact Us
  • Worldwide
  • Boston, MA
  • Chicago, IL
  • Denver, CO
  • Dublin, Ireland
  • Edwardsville, IL
  • Jefferson City, MO
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • London, England
  • Miami, FL
  • New York, NY
  • Orange County, CA
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Princeton, NJ
  • Salt Lake City, UT
  • St. Louis, MO
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Wilmington, DE
Worldwide
abstract image of world map
Boston, MA
800 Boylston St.
30th Floor
Boston, MA 02199
Google Maps
Boston, Massachusetts
Chicago, IL
100 North Riverside Plaza
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606-1520
Google Maps
Chicago, Illinois
Denver, CO
4643 S. Ulster St.
Suite 800
Denver, CO 80237
Google Maps
Denver, Colorado
Dublin, Ireland
Fitzwilliam Hall, Fitzwilliam Place
Dublin 2, Ireland
Google Maps
Edwardsville, IL
115 N. Second St.
Edwardsville, IL 62025
Google Maps
Edwardsville, Illinois
Jefferson City, MO
101 E. High St.
First Floor
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Google Maps
Jefferson City, Missouri
Kansas City, MO
2345 Grand Blvd.
Suite 1500
Kansas City, MO 64108
Google Maps
Kansas City, Missouri
Las Vegas, NV
7160 Rafael Rivera Way
Suite 320
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Google Maps
Las Vegas, Nevada
London, England
Royal College of Surgeons of England
38-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields
London, WC2A 3PE
Google Maps
Miami, FL
355 Alhambra Circle
Suite 1200
Coral Gables, FL 33134
Google Maps
Photo of Miami, Florida
New York, NY
7 Times Square, 44th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Google Maps
New York City skyline
Orange County, CA
19800 MacArthur Boulevard
Suite 300
Irvine, CA 92612
Google Maps
Philadelphia, PA
2005 Market Street
29th Floor, One Commerce Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Google Maps
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Princeton, NJ
100 Overlook Center
Second Floor
Princeton, NJ 08540
Google Maps
Princeton, New Jersey
Salt Lake City, UT
222 South Main St.
Suite 1830
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Google Maps
Salt Lake City, Utah
St. Louis, MO
7700 Forsyth Blvd.
Suite 1800
St. Louis, MO 63105
Google Maps
St. Louis, Missouri
Washington, D.C.
1717 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20006
Google Maps
Photo of Washington, D.C. with the Capitol in the foreground and Washington Monument in the background.
Wilmington, DE
1007 North Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Google Maps
Wilmington, Delaware